On Sun, 2013-07-14 at 16:32 -0700, Lindar Greenwood wrote: > I'm not sure how we'd go about adding intent-of-rule post-scripts to > existing rules, especially since the point of some of them is to be > open to interpretation, but I think it would be delightful for new > rules proposed to have an intent-of-rule clause included, or at least > have that be an option.
This sounds like the sort of thing that's maintained as FLR annotations. At the moment, those are just references to past judgements, but explaining what a rule is for is the sort of thing that would both be interesting and not easy to do as a judgement. It'd be easy enough to add them as something the Rulekeepor had to track, but I'm not sure if there's a good way of forcing/reminding players to add them. Perhaps if there were a reward for it? -- ais523
