On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 5:01 PM, Kerim Aydin <[email protected]> wrote: > The form of R101 was written at the same time the equity courts were > created, so it would have been possible to say "if you agreed to X, > but now think it violates your rights, you could apply for relief > to equity courts". > > But really, not tested. > > -G.
Indeed, and I think it would and should still be effective at protecting against *uncontemplated* erosion of rights. But where an individual clearly intends to pass their right away, I do not think R101 protects. -scshunt
