On Wed, 23 Apr 2014, x1122334455 wrote: > On 4/22/14 at 7:33pm, omd wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 6:36 PM, Ãrjan Johansen wrote: > > > On Tue, 22 Apr 2014, x1122334455 wrote: > > >> I apologize, what's going on? I'm new. > > > They're voting on a proposal for fixing a bug in one of the rules for how > > > to > > > win the game, but they don't seem to agree that the new version is bug > > > free. > > > :) > > > > Actually, the proposal in question would simply allow the Scorekeepor > > to award points at will, and they're debating exactly how destructive > > that could be. > > > That sounds like a bad idea.
It's actually not that bad, if we tweak it so that it's not just a grab for the vacant office after a win. For example, if it forced an election for the office instead of leaving it up for grabs it would be fine.
