On 4/24/14 at 12:39pm, Alex Smith <[email protected]> wrote:
> Yahoo! mangled the Promotor's message so badly > I'm not even going to attempt to quote it; but I vote as follows: > > 7632 PRESENT > 7633 FOR; I like this compromise > 7634 PRESENT > 7635 AGAINST; historically, such rules have been mostly > pointless except as a source of scams, and I can't see a > way to scam this one (although it does have highly crazy timing > properties) > 7636 FOR > 7637 FOR > 7638 AGAINST; I may change this vote once I get a chance to > read the document in question, but I'm really busy right now > 7639 FOR > 7640 AGAINST; we don't have any way to make binding > agreements right now, so it's basically a "win the game" office > > Sorry for my activity levels. RL is really overbearing right now. > > -- > ais523 > Since I have no real idea what is going on, I'm abstaining from the vote if that is still allowed.
