On Mon, 28 Apr 2014, x1122334455 wrote: > On 4/28/14 at 2:03am, omd wrote: > > > I assign CFJ 3406 to LiberonScien: > > > > On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 5:33 AM, Alex Smith > > wrote: > > > On Wed, 23/4/14, Jonathan Rouillard wrote: > > > > > >> Well, it looks like hazing isn't a crime anymore so... I CFJ on > > >> x1122334455, putting forth tradition as my main argument. > > > > > >> Also: Welcome! =D > > > > > > I CFJ on whether that is a CFJ. Arguments against: it doesn't > > > clearly specify a statement. Arguments for: most experienced > > > players can deduce the statement from context. > > > > (See Rule 591.) > > > Did I do something wrong?
Nope! You've been assigned to be a judge. Check out R591 for how you respond. The statement "on whether that is a CFJ" is hard to answer true or false (just because it's not a clean statement with a true/false answer) so your response might be Dismiss due to it being a bad sentence.
