On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 1:59 PM, Kerim Aydin <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 28 Apr 2014, omd wrote: > > I assign CFJ 3406 to LiberonScien: > > I CFJ on the following: omd assigned CFJ 3406 using a process > that, over time, would allow all interested players have a reasonably > equal opportunity to judge. > > I bar omd. > > Arguments. > > The clause at issue is the last sentence of R991. omd has not > explicitly stated how e chooses judges, or how e's tracking > "interested players". I wondered, when I wrote that part of R991, > whether a breach of this rule (if it happened) could even be > detected, so this seems like as good a test case for the burden > of proof on that clause as any. > As far as I'm aware, I've been on the "interested" list for quite some time and to the best of my knowledge have not been assigned a case. Am I missing something with all the recent rule changes?
