On Fri, 30 May 2014, Fool wrote in a surprisingly non-foolish judgement:
It's too bad prop 7657 could not have resolved first, but, time is running out and, as per H. Assessor, you guys are lame. Now Sean was of course legally required to insult you. I, on the other hand, am insulting you pro bono.
Shouldn't that be "pro malo" or something.
Even Agorans will, for the most part, have sensibly skipped to the end well before reaching this point.
OK, time for a poll: Did you notice that sentence in the original message before reading it here?