On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 5:17 PM, omd <[email protected]> wrote: >> omd says: >> "tightly meeting deadlines is not usually considered a problem" >> >> Rule 1607 states that "the Promotor SHALL, as part of eir weekly >> duties, distribute all pending proposals. Therefore, it is not >> meeting the weekly deadline is considered a problem. > > Correct. However, eir failure to give you a chance to warn em in time > is not itself a problem, so because e was unwarned at the time e > actually violated the deadline, this is the context in which an > appropriate punishment should be decided, despite your repeated > subsequent messages.
Oh. > >> Regardless of the Referee's behavior, what scshunt deserves as >> punishment does not have to be what the Referee assigns to scshunt. > > This is why I think the former is irrelevant to the game. I'm not saying that the outcome of this CfJ shouldn't have any weight in the Referee's decision though. -Henri
