On Mon, 2014-10-06 at 09:32 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote: > 7. omd was clearly "counting" on us making that assumption, then > pointing out that the assumption wrong. Now, if omd had shown > the assumption was wrong due to a hidden specific rules loophole, > that's how the game is played. I disagree with this point, at least. I think that omd originally fully intended to wait four days, but when e saw me planning a counterscam, e decided to attempt to trigger the change early to stop the counterscam; a chance of eir scam working would be better than no chance of the scam working.
-- ais523
