On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 11:46 PM, omd <[email protected]> wrote: > Voting results for Proposals 7694-97: > > [This notice resolves the Agoran decisions of whether to adopt the > following proposals. For each decision, the options available to > Agora are ADOPTED (*), REJECTED (x), and FAILED QUORUM (!).] > > Whoa, we have voters. > > Special note: 7697 was distributed with the wrong text: a comment at > the end was chopped off. Since I am publishing this more than a week > after the distribution, the distribution is still valid, and since the > error was only a comment, not part of any rule changes, the > recently-popular clause of Rule 105 is not involved. Therefore, I > think the proposal passes without issue. I have corrected the text in > this message. (I'm curious whether Rule 105 would have prevented > adoption if the error were substantive, despite players having an > opportunity to review the proposal when it was originally posted...) > > *7694 omd 1.7 Case at the statement > x7695 omd 1.0 Useless recruitment fix > *7696 omd 1.0 Black Card fix > *7697 omd 1.0 Non-timed duty accuracy > > 7694 7695 7696 7697 > > ais523 F F F F > aranea F A A F > G. F F A F > Henri F F F F > Ienpw III F A F F > omd A > Roujo F A F F > Sprocklem F A F F > Tiger F A A A > woggle F F F F > > AI 1.7 1 1 1 > VI *U* 0.7 2 8 > F/A 9/0 4/6 6/3 8/1 >
omd, are you still Speaker, or did you resign? Shouldn't you have two votes in this?
