On Mon, 3 Nov 2014 18:34:58 -0500 omd <c.ome...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 6:09 PM, Luis Ressel <ara...@aixah.de> wrote: > > I've got the essential parameters -- author, AI, text -- right, so > > the initiation of the Agoran Decision of whether to adopt proposal > > 7723 succeeded -- after all, I'm permitted to initiate such > > decisions. However, I did fail to correctly reference Henri's > > proposal, so distributing, removing it from the pool and assigning > > an ID to it failed. So, I did initate a decision about a certain > > proposal with the text of Henri's proposal, but I definitly didn't > > distribute Henri's proposal. > > This was a thing many years ago, but at present creating a proposal > requires an explicit announcement to that effect, so you distributed > either Henri's proposal or none at all. I do not agree your > distribution fails to clearly identify the proposal in question - > after all, nobody seems to be in doubt about which one it is. >
That's not exactly what I've said. IMO, I didn't create any new proposals -- but I did initiate a decision about whether to adopt a mysterious, unspecified "proposal 7723". And of course I've referenced Henri's proposal with a sufficient degree of acurateness for everyone to understand which proposal I'm referring to. But that's beside the point; the question is whether I've referenced it in a /formally/ correct way; and if not, whether this prevents my attempt at distribution. -- Luis Ressel <ara...@aixah.de> GPG fpr: F08D 2AF6 655E 25DE 52BC E53D 08F5 7F90 3029 B5BD
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
