On Sun, Jul 12, 2015 at 8:01 PM, omd <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 12, 2015 at 3:06 PM, Sean Hunt <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
>>           greater than the decisions adoption index and the ration of
>
> decisions; ratio
>
>>           the strength of FOR to the strength of AGAINST is equal to
>>           the decision's adoption index, then the vote collector shall
>>           select either ADOPTED or REJECTED as the outcome;
>
> When shall e, within 7 days?  And CAN e?  In any case, this seems to
> contradict the earlier statement that the decision has an outcome as
> soon as its voting period ends.

This matches the existing language for elections. I think that the
mechanism to do so is via Rule 208, specifying the outcome in the
resolution. I agree that there is ambiguity in the interim period;
perhaps the simplest way to deal with it.

Also, per discussion with aranea, I intend to deputize for Herald to
initiate a Silver Quill Ceremony for July 14, 2015.

>> Proposal: Official References (AI=1)
>> {{{
>> Enact a new power-1 Rule entitled "Official References" reading:
>>       Where a rule refers to an office in a way such that, by
>>       necessary implication, it refers to the holder of that office
>>       (including to authorize or forbid an action), it implicitly refers
>>       to the player holding that office. Where there are references to
>>       the past or future, then absent indication to the contrary, the
>>       rule shall be interpreted as referring to the holder of the office
>>       at the time in question. If a rule refers to the "current <office>"
>>       or uses similar language, then it refers to the office's present
>>       holder, regardless of its holder at the time in question.
>
> I think the last two sentences could be combined.
>
>> Proposal: Centralization (AI=2)
>> {{{
>> Amend Rule 1006 (Offices) by replacing:
>>       An imposed office is an office described as such by the rule
>>       defining it.  All others are voluntary.  A person CANNOT
>>       be made the holder of a voluntary office without eir explicit
>>       or reasonably implied consent. The holder of a voluntary
>>       office CAN resign it by announcement, causing it to become
>>       vacant.
>
> replacing what with what?

erp. thanks.

-scshunt

Reply via email to