On Sat, Jul 25, 2015 at 1:03 PM, Kerim Aydin <[email protected]> wrote: > In interpreting the functioning of assets, assets should generally > be assumed to be indivisible physical objects in the possession of > their owners, and that transfers between owners are "in person".
For the first clause, I'd prefer "assets can generally only exist in nonnegative integer quantities", and for the second... I dunno. "In person" sounds pretty vague to me; I don't know exactly what it's supposed to entail. --the Warrigal
