On Jul 29, 2015 16:50, "Kerim Aydin" <[email protected]> wrote: > CFJ, barring scshunt: > The announcement attempting to start Silver Quill voting on > or about July 26 did not clearly indicate voting options.
Arguments: Historically, it was required to include the set of eligible voters. It was included in the rules that a description of the eligible voters was sufficient. Similarly, I used a description of the eligible options, rather than a complete list. > As a side note, while there's a few clear popular options, I do > not feel it is fair at all this way - it's too easy for early > voters to influence people not wanting to look back through the > records. As such, if this decision exists, I Protest this by > not contributing to quorum - this is a tainted vote. I already produced a list of eligible proposals, so I must disagree. -scshunt
