On Thu, 4 Feb 2016 23:21:56 -0500 Henri Bouchard <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Feb 4, 2016 10:25 PM, "Gaelan Steele" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > First, a note: these proposals need to be reissued to require > > Credits v2 > to be adopted instead. Also, is there anything preventing me from > taking all of someone's credits for missing a minor deadline? > > > > Ideally, the cfj should be in the form "[Player] violation of [Rule] > warrants a Penalty Sum of X" rather than "[Player] violated [Rule]" > so that the judgment is on the Penalty Sum rather than whether or not > the crime was committed. So there are actually two judgments to be > made: whether or not the crime was committed, and what the Penalty > Sum should be. I'll fix this proposal and resubmit it. Thanks for > pointing it out. > Whoops, I probably should've read agora-discussion before distributing the proposals. Sorry! -- aranea
