Um. New guy here. Sorry, but I'm a bit confused. If I'm getting this right
you're objecting... To something you proposed? That doesn't sound right. I
think I'm getting confused? Or what are you doing? And what doses the "do
so mean"? I'm sorry, I'm probably making some error here.

-Aris

On Wednesday, September 21, 2016, ais523 <callforjudgem...@yahoo.co.uk>
wrote:

> On Wed, 2016-09-14 at 07:53 +0100, ais523 wrote:
> > I intend, without objection, to ratify the Patent Title holdings
> > published in the most recent Herald's Report, published on 15 August
> > 2016 in a message with subject "OFF: [Herald] The Scroll of Agora".
> > This list of holdings is inaccurate because it includes some Patent
> > Titles that were never awarded due to insufficient power. The reason
> > for ratifying it is to gain certainty about which patent titles were
> > awarded (as the mechanism for awarding patent titles was broken) and
> > because the patent titles in question are good for the game and
> > awarding them should not fail on a technicality.
>
> I object and do so.
>
> --
> ais523
>

Reply via email to