Hi Alexis, I didn't distribute your proposals because they both contain some typos (see below); please retract and resubmit them. By the way, your MUA ruined the layout of your proposals, so I had to reformat them. Please adjust its settings accordingly.
On Fri, 14 Oct 2016 16:35:31 +0200 Luis Ressel <ara...@aixah.de> wrote: > ID: pp1 > Title: Agencies > Adoption index: 3.0 > Author: Alexis > Co-author(s): > > Enact a new power-3 rule entitled "Acting on Behalf" that reads as > follows: > > When a rule allows one person (the agent) to act on behalf of > another (the principal) to perform an action, that agent CAN > perform the action if it is POSSIBLE for the principal to do so, > taking into account any prerequisites for the action. If the > enabling rule does not specify the mechanism by which the agent > may do so, then the agent CAN perform the action in the same > manner in which the principal CAN do so, with the additional > requirement that the agent must, in the message in which the > action is performed, uniquely identify the principal and and... what? > [snip] > Amend Rule 2124 (Agoran Satisfaction) by adding: > (4) if the action is to be performed With Notice or With T > Notice. after bullet (3). Good catch. This looks like a bug in the current ruleset. > [snip] > Enact a new power-1 rule entitled "Superintendent" that reads as > follows: > [snip] > > The Superintendent's month report includes the Head and > properties of all Agencies. s/month/monthly/. Also, it is common practice to reject proposals that create a new office without providing an officeholder, so please add "Install Alexis to the Superintentend office" or something similar. > ID: pp2 > Title: Voting Strength Fix (PENDING, BUGGY) > Adoption index: 3.0 > Author: Alexis > Co-author(s): o > > [snip] > Amend rule 2423 (First Among Equals) by replacing the second > paragraph with: > > On any Agoran decision to adopt a Proposal, the holder of the > office of Prime Minister has voting strength one greater than > e would have if e did not hold the office. I'd prefer if this part was moved to a separate proposal. After all, I don't see why we should remove the Prime Minister's double voting power for elections. > Amend rule 955 by replacing (Determining the Will of Agora) by > replacing the text with: Some superfluous words. > Each Agoran decision has a voting method, which determines how > voters may vote on it and how to calculate the outcome. The > strength of a ballot is the voting strength of the voter who > cast it on that Agoran decision. > > The following voting methods are defined: > > (1) AI-majority: the valid votes are FOR and AGAINST. Let F be > the total strength of all valid ballots cast FOR a decision, > A be the same for AGAINST, and AI becthe adoption index of > the decision. The outcome is ADOPTED if F/A >= AI and F/A > > 1 (or F>0 and A=0), otherwise REJECTED. s/becthe/be the/ > [snip] Other than that, the proposals look good to me. Be sure to resubmit them, I'll definitly vote FOR them (unless other issues arise). -- aranea
