You might want to take a look at the discussion for the economic proposal - part of it would include punishments you have to pay off.
In general, we have to be careful with punishments though. Making someone a less capable player, or stigmatizing them, is not very likely to encourage them to do their job better. An unreliable office-holder is better than no office-holder. I do like the vigilante part though, it might streamline things. Just need to keep the reward modest to prevent abuses (collusion, or just extremely petty carding). On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 10:16 AM, Alexis Hunt <aler...@gmail.com> wrote: > I haven't worked on the exact wording, but I would like to ask others' > opinions on this: > > Make the Referee into more of a vigilante system. Players can propose > cards to the Referee, and the Referee is responsible for basically giving > them approval. I think there should be a Card (or Cards) which impose > tangible punishment less strict than the Red, but I'm working on a separate > economy proposal so that will probably be a part of that. Players are > rewarded for submitting correct allegations. > > Thoughts? > > Alexis >
