On Fri, 21 Apr 2017, Alex Smith wrote: > On Fri, 2017-04-21 at 09:44 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > This leaves open the question of what happens if a person does > > consent without registering (might be hard to do, as a statement of > > consent is generally taken to be a registration attempt). > > What about consent to a foreign forum? It seems like common sense that > you can't change Agora's gamestate like that (otherwise we'd have a ton > of inaccurate reports based on behaviour away from the Agoran lists), > but also seems plausible that it could at least specify consent > (private contracts often used to be agreed over non-nomic-related IRC > channels).
Actually, that's probably ok, and probably even our Discussion forum would work. I thought the prohibition against binding said "explicit, wilful consent". But the "explicit" part is gone (I checked - it used to be in the Rights version of R101, maybe it's been gone a while). So it's likely that a variety of ways could be used to infer wilful consent.
