I have no ill against you barring me, just that I wasn't familiar with the procedure.
天火狐 On 27 April 2017 at 22:04, Owen Jacobson <o...@grimoire.ca> wrote: > That’s pretty much it. You’re best-placed to actually provide insight into > the truthiness of the statement, which is why I barred you: I’m actually > trying to figure out how Agora as a whole interprets the 蘭亭社 charter. > Having you step in and answer directly somewhat defeats the purpose. > > -o > > On Apr 27, 2017, at 2:51 AM, Josh T <draconicdarkn...@gmail.com> wrote: > > This sounds like an issue where I sit on the sideline and eat popcorn and > maybe attempt to correct if everyone is horribly off-mark. Wonderful. > > On 27 April 2017 at 02:46, Alex Smith <ais...@alumni.bham.ac.uk> wrote: > >> On Thu, 2017-04-27 at 02:43 -0400, Josh T wrote: >> > I am confused by the wording "barring 天火狐", and seek clarification >> > on the issue. >> >> When you call a CFJ, you can choose one player who will not be able to >> judge that CFJ; that's called "barring a player". Normally you do that >> if the CFJ is about that player or something that that player is >> associated with (to avoid conflicts of interest), or if the eligibility >> of the player to judge the CFJ would depend on the result of the CFJ. >> However, you don't have to state your reason, and there doesn't even >> have to be a reason. >> >> -- >> ais523 >> > > >
