On Thu, 11 May 2017, Aris Merchant wrote: > The assignment of this CFJ to me is ambiguous. It says "Judge: Aris", > but also "Assigned to o: as of this message." I am under the > impression that this action is too ambiguous to succeed, but to > confirm: I CFJ barring o on the statement "I am not the Judge of CFJ > 3481." I submit the above as arguments.
Sigh. Agora lesson: I should never, ever say "unless someone wants to argue" because in Agora, someone pedantic WILL want to argue. Earlier discussion: > On Sat, 6 May 2017, Owen Jacobson wrote: >> It _looks_ great, and reads really well. I like it a lot. >> >> However, it’s got some data issues. It lists a case assigned to me that, as >> far as I can tell, is not assigned to me. Have a look at CFJ 3481: your site >> lists me next to it, but in >> http://www.mail-archive.com/agora-official@agoranomic.org/msg07879.html, >> you assigned it to Aris. > > Thanks for the catch - it comes from the cut/paste error you can see in that > original assignment email (unless someone wants to argue that the assignment > did something unexpected because of that :P). (Gratuitous argument: at least to o, it was clear that the assignment to Aris was correct and the later bit was a typo).
