On Tue, 30 May 2017, grok (caleb vines) wrote:
And lots of the other things G. mentioned earlier in this thread.
[No distinction between quoted and unquoted parts, whatsoever, in either version]
A minor suggestion from an observer: you could use slightly kinder language on those dismissal ideas. Like DISMISSED WITHOUT STANDING if a CFJ has no apparent or impending impact on the game state, and DISMISSED WITHOUT EVIDENCE if the caller or another player do not provide enough evidence or argument to adjudicate.
Someone nuke gmail headquarters, please. Greetings, Ørjan.
