A two-fer: On Jun 14, 2017, at 1:51 PM, Ørjan Johansen <oer...@nvg.ntnu.no> wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Jun 2017, Owen Jacobson wrote: > >> Sprocklem 10 >> 天火狐 10 > > The 10 after 天火狐 isn't lined up with the rest. I'm viewing with a monospaced > font and all three CJK characters are double width, which ISTR someone said > was right. I can never tell. As published, they line up correctly in my editor, but the cursor flits to the left one character when entering that line, so there’s clearly an issue there. Thankfully, it doesn’t matter for _this_ document, for the same reason… On Jun 14, 2017, at 9:43 AM, Alex Smith <ais...@alumni.bham.ac.uk> wrote: > On Wed, 2017-06-14 at 02:50 -0400, Owen Jacobson wrote: >> As Secretary, it is my pleasure to report that Agora has paid the >> following salaries to players: > > CoE: This first attempt at making the report was inaccurate (and was > withdrawn by its author). See the second attempt for details on what > was wrong. > > (This message brought to you by the fact that being withdrawn by its > author is not enough to prevent a message self-ratifying. In the > future, try CoEing your own reports if they're wrong.) … I didn’t publish a CoE for the first revision: as near as I can tell, it’s not a report, and therefore not governed like one. No rule apparently requires that the Secretary publish payday announcements any more, and I do so only as a public service. I do feel honour-bound to make that announcement accurate, because inaccurate information on -official is a great source of confusion down the line, but I don’t think there’s any danger of that inaccurate information becoming true by ratification. The same can’t be said about the Weekly Report, which references the payday message. That report is mandatory and contains the resulting values of switches, and therefore self-ratifies as per Rule 2162. -o
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
