This wouldn’t have changed things because I would have objected. Also, I see no reason that game flow should be a major consideration. ---- Publius Scribonius Scholasticus p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
> On Jun 29, 2017, at 9:35 AM, CuddleBeam <cuddleb...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > Remove the issued card from Ais because our laws were just insufficient for > this case, really. (And we can do arbitrary stuff with proposals lol) > > Amend "The Arbitor SHALL assign judges over time such that all interested > players have reasonably equal opportunities to judge." to: > > "The Arbitor SHALL assign judges over time such that all interested players > have reasonably equal opportunities to judge. The Arbitor can supercede the > previous for the sake of gameplay flow Without Objection."
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
