I retract any and all CFJs We could even not burden the arbitor further with text such as "Any player may, without objection, make themselves judge of any unassigned CFJ they reasonably believe to be wholly insubstantial and frivolous and assign it a judgement of DISMISS"
(Stealing the words wholly insubstantial and frivolous from American law, but not sure if they're even needed). On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 4:32 PM, Alex Smith <ais...@alumni.bham.ac.uk> wrote: > On Fri, 2017-07-21 at 16:27 +1000, V.J Rada wrote: > > You're right, the rules are strangely different as to deregistration. > > Probably because it has consequences by barring you from registering for > a > > while. I think when playing a game, the form "I'll do X" is acceptable as > > "I do X". eg: "I'll go to attacks" is always interpreted as "I go to > > attacks" in the card game I have played, and is a normal form. > > > > I'm only arguing this because if CB is deregistering out of embarrassment > > it is unlikely that they will check their nomic-using email for a while, > > and waiting two months isn't optimal to deregister em. > > > > The pledge theory isn't bad either. > > Do you want me to assign the CFJ? Or is this explanation good enough? > In the later case, you should retract the CFJ or I'll be legally > obliged to award it anyway. > > Proto: Summary judgement on both CFJs and finger-points, subject to a > very easy mechanism (e.g. 1 support) for overriding it and going to a > full case with judges, etc.. This allows the Arbitor or Referee > respectively to solve a controversy if e thinks the situation is simple > and unambiguous, and only requires a drawn-out process if other people > disagree. > > -- > ais523 >
