And unfortunately, I don't think this CFJ is retractable so the two CFJs should be assigned to the same person.
On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 1:58 PM, V.J Rada <[email protected]> wrote: > CFJs can't be assigned to non-players, right? Only judged by them. So, > someone point a finger at ais. ais, give CB's valid CFJ to someone > else. That person, obviously non-players can't be speaker. > > On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 1:16 PM, grok (caleb vines) <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> >> On Aug 24, 2017 10:15 PM, "Ørjan Johansen" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On Fri, 25 Aug 2017, Alex Smith wrote: >> >>> Luckily, your CFJ isn't valid; you can't call a CFJ nowadays without >>> paying for it. So it hasn't actually been called yet. Also luckily, we >>> still have some vestiges of the old officer system in which officers >>> had, in lieu of pay, a certain allowance for abuses of the office. That >>> means that it's totally legal, and in fact somewhat encouraged (see the >>> penultimate paragraph of rule 991), for me to do this: >> >> >> Unfortunately, eir registration attempt was sent to the wrong forum, and >> IIRC non-Players don't have to pay. >> >> Greetings, >> Ørjan. >> >> >> In defense, that does make the judgment much easier. >> >> -grok > > > > -- > From V.J Rada -- >From V.J Rada
