You're still the arbitor, obviously. On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 4:51 PM, VJ Rada <[email protected]> wrote: > Sorry, I was much more on top oif it last week than this week. All of > that is noted. > > On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 12:28 PM, Kerim Aydin <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> Another note: >> >> It used to be that you had to officially "change" your vote (R683), or >> retract first, or later ballots didn't count. I'm not sure there's a >> precedent that just saying "I vote..." works if you've already cast a >> vote, although in this case maybe the parenthetical gives enough context...? >> >> (this is just "in theory", as already mentioned these votes were late). >> >> On Thu, 21 Sep 2017, VJ Rada wrote: >>> Before I resolve them, I will vote in the elections for Rulekeepor, >>> Surveyor, Referee, Tailor, Superintendent, Promotor and Arbitor. For >>> all of the above except Tailor, I vote for the incumbent. For Tailor I >>> vote Quazie. >>> >>> (Originally I endorsed G in all of these, but e didn't vote) >>> >>> -- >>> From V.J. Rada >>> >> > > > > -- > From V.J. Rada
-- >From V.J. Rada
