It was intended as a potential transfer - I believed it likely succeeded - but explicitly didn't care if it failed On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 20:44 Cuddle Beam <cuddleb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> (not really slang but like non-explicit language in general : P ) > > On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 5:43 AM, Cuddle Beam <cuddleb...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> It feels a bit like a game of Limbo with slang lol. How slang can you >> go!- before it becomes non-gamestate. >> >> On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 4:30 AM, Owen Jacobson <o...@grimoire.ca> wrote: >> >>> I’ve accounted for it as one, on the premise that “insert” is a fairly >>> obvious synonym for “give” in this context, and that there’s exactly one >>> thing that can both own shinies and receive trust tokens that the noun >>> “ATM” could reasonably refer to. >>> >>> Want to CFJ it? I don’t, but I’ll provide evidence if you do. >>> >>> -o >>> >>> > On Sep 22, 2017, at 10:27 PM, Gaelan Steele <g...@canishe.com> wrote: >>> > >>> > Is this a shiny transfer? >>> >> On Sep 21, 2017, at 12:32 PM, Quazie <quazieno...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >> >>> >> Insert 1 Shiny into the recently registered ATM. >>> >> >>> >> I give ATM a trust token. >>> >>> >> >
