Oh, okay, I see. Well, there goes my second attempt at taking advantage of the cheap pend price. :P
On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 8:41 PM, VJ Rada <vijar...@gmail.com> wrote: > This is actually a version of the rules so new our H. Rulekeepor > hasn't written it yet :) > > On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 11:39 AM, ATMunn . <iamingodsa...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 8:32 PM, Alexis Hunt <aler...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> On Thu, 12 Oct 2017 at 20:31 Alex Smith <ais...@alumni.bham.ac.uk> > wrote: > >>> > >>> On Thu, 2017-10-12 at 20:28 -0400, ATMunn . wrote: > >>> > Amend rule 2450 by adding the following text at the end: > >>> > { > >>> > If, at any time, a player owns a pledge which is impossible for em to > >>> > break, e CAN withdraw that pledge without objection and with 24 hours > >>> > notice. > >>> > } > >>> > >>> We used to allow the Notary to do this unilaterally (without any sort > >>> of dependent action). It lead to some fun counterscams (it's surprising > >>> how often someone would create a contract as part of a scam and forget > >>> to put at least one obligation in it). > > > > Heh, sounds fun. > >>> > >>> > >>> On another subject, note that I think this requires waiting for 4 days > >>> for objections, the way it's worded (not 100% sure on that). You > >>> probably didn't mean that. You might want to define "withdraw", too > >>> (although the natural-language meaning probably works). > > > > Hm, you're probably right. How exactly might I do that? > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> ais523 > >> > >> > >> Rule 2450 already provides for withdrawal without objection. > > > > ...It doesn't? Rule 2450 reads: > >> > >> A player SHALL NOT break eir own publicly-made pledges. > >> > >> A pledge may be considered broken if the pledger does not complete > >> it > >> in a timely manner after it becomes possible to do so. A pledge > may > >> be > >> considered broken at the moment the pledger engages in conduct > >> proscribed by that pledge. > > > > Am I missing something or are you remembering an older version of the > rules? > > > > -- > From V.J. Rada >