I don't really know what you mean by that, I don't think so?
Anyone can win via a Victory Election; this is much harder to achieve as
you have to not do anything wrong in order to be eligible.
On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 9:33 PM, VJ Rada <vijar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Isn't that just 1/6 of a Victory Election?
>
> On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 12:18 PM, ATMunn . <iamingodsa...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Thanks, both of you, for your suggestions. I'm working on a revised
> version
> > at the moment. One idea I had, regarding what Alexis said about the idea
> of
> > players declaring themselves eligible for a Badge of Honor, (now Medal of
> > Honour) is the idea of the recordkeepor initiating an Agoran Decision on
> who
> > will get the medal. All players who declared themselves eligible for a
> medal
> > at the time of the initiation of the Agoran Decision would be the
> possible
> > votes. This would ease the load on the recordkeepor even more, as e would
> > only have to worry about initiating and resolving the election.
> >
> > On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 7:09 PM, Aris Merchant
> > <thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 8:50 AM, ATMunn . <iamingodsa...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> > Title: A Reward for Obedience
> >> > Author: ATMunn
> >> > Co-Author(s):
> >> > AI: 1
> >> >
> >> > Create a new power-1 rule titled "Badges of Honor"
> >> > {
> >> > Badges of Honor are an indestructible, player-owned asset. The
> >> > Referee
> >> > is the recordkeepor for Badges of Honor.
> >>
> >> I'd go with "Badges of Honor are a destructible fixed currency tracked
> >> by the Referee" (which would make the holder restriction unnecessary),
> >> or, if you want them to be transferable "Badges of Honor are a liquid
> >> currency tracked by the Referee. Ownership of Badges of Honor is
> >> restricted to players".
> >>
> >> I have three further comments. First, this might be something best
> >> tracked by the Herald (maybe even the Tailor, as ribbons work on a
> >> similar basis), who deals with matters of honor. E would have to check
> >> the Referee's report, but right now the Referee has to check the
> >> Herald's report, so there's really no change. Second, you should
> >> probably change it not to have "badge" in the name, as badges are
> >> already defined by Rule 2415. Third, you could consider having persons
> >> be able to own them. If that was true, but gaining one was restricted
> >> to players, the effect would be that a person who deregisters and
> >> reregisters would get to keep eir badge count, the same way it is for
> >> ribbons.
> >>
> >> -Aris
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> From V.J. Rada
>
