[sorry for double post, Gmail doesn't have a good way to reply to multiple
emails at once. I'm probably going to switch to a desktop client soon.]


On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 8:37 PM, Alexis Hunt <aler...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Looking it over again, I see three potential other issues:
> - A player does not stop becoming eligible at the end of the month. I
> would say "eligible for a Medal of Honour that month", to avoid this.
>
​Yep, that's a very good point. I'll add that.​


> - If a player incorrectly announces eligibility, this could invalidate the
> entire vote later. Not sure what the best fix is.
>
​Yeah, I'm not sure about that either.​


> - Minor typo: E's -> Eir
>
​I'm a derp.​


>
> On Tue, 17 Oct 2017 at 20:31 Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Oh, last thing:  you should throw in this Proposal a repeal of the
>> Victory Elections
>> (Rule 2482).  This is a much better replacement and we don't need both.
>>
>> On Tue, 17 Oct 2017, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> > Just a note:  It looks like the Herald isn't required to track who has
>> a Medal of
>> > Honour once it's awarded.  So it's like trust tokens that people just
>> have to
>> > keep track - is that intentional?  (As Herald I'd probably put this in
>> my monthly
>> > report anyway).
>> >
>> > Also there's a timing problem.  "In the second week of an Agoran
>> month..." doesn't
>> > play well with "SHALL in a timely fashion" - does that mean in a timely
>> fashion after
>> > the beginning of the second week?  After the end?  If you want it done
>> in the second
>> > week, you'd delete the "in a timely fashion" and then the Herald SHALL
>> do it in the
>> > second week and it works.  The way it reads, it almost sounds
>> > like the Herald CAN in the second week only, but SHALL in a timely
>> fashion after
>> > the second week (so net effect is it can't be done).
>> >
>> > There's a bit of confusion to me about what "the first week of an Agoran
>> > month" is - whether it's the 7 days after the start of the month - or
>> somehow the
>> > first Agoran week that starts in the month.  (this one's minor I'd
>> guess the 7
>> > days).
>> >
>> > Minor grammar point:  Instead of "E's" it should be "Eir".
>> >
>> > (and - apologies for not looking closely until you asked about the
>> karma!  I
>> > really like the idea.)
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, 17 Oct 2017, ATMunn . wrote:
>> > > I submit the following proposal and pend it with 1 shiny.
>> > >
>> > > Title: "A Reward for Obedience v3"
>> > > Author: ATMunn
>> > > Co-Author(s): Aris, Alexis
>> > > AI: 1
>> > >
>> > > Create a new power-1 rule titled "Medals of Honour"
>> > > {
>> > >     Medals of Honour are a destructible fixed currency tracked by the
>> Herald.
>> > >
>> > >     In the first week of an Agoran Month, any player CAN declare
>> emself to be eligible for a Medal of Honour by announcement if all of the
>> following are true:
>> > >     * E has made at least 1 message to a public forum in the last
>> Agoran month.
>> > >     * E's Karma is not below -3.
>> > >     * In the last Agoran month, e has not had a Card issued to em.
>> > >
>> > >     In the second week of an Agoran Month, if there are any players
>> who are eligible for a Medal of Honour, the Herald CAN, by announcement,
>> and SHALL in a timely fashion, initiate an Agoran Decision on who is to be
>> awarded a Medal of Honour.
>> > >     For this decision, the valid votes are all players who are
>> eligible for a Medal of Honour, the vote collector is the Herald, and the
>> voting method is instant-runoff.
>> > >     Upon the resolution of this decision, the Herald CAN, and SHALL
>> in a timely fashion, award the outcome of the decision a Medal of Honour by
>> announcement.
>> > >
>> > >     If, at any time, any player has 6 or more Medals of Honour, and e
>> has not won via this rule previously, e can win the game by announcement,
>> destroying all of eir Medals of Honour.
>> > > }
>> > >
>> > > [Changes from the prototype: I made it so that you can still get a
>> medal even if your karma is negative, as long as it's not below -3. I also
>> reworded the last part of the Agoran Decision section.]
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
>

Reply via email to