You deputize by actually performing the action (e.g. actually publishing an up-to-date Ruleset that's overdue). Multiple people might announce their intent to do so ahead of time, but that doesn't make the office change (or reserve it for them).
So you'd do it by saying "I deputize for the Rulekeepor to publish the following report:" followed by the actual report. On Sun, 22 Oct 2017, Reuben Staley wrote: > Oh. Then it's PSS' responsibility now and not mine? > > -- > Trigon > > On Oct 22, 2017 8:40 AM, "Alexis Hunt" <aler...@gmail.com> wrote: > That was only an intent; you haven't actually done it yet. > > On Sun, 22 Oct 2017 at 10:34 Reuben Staley <reuben.sta...@gmail.com> wrote: > Are people still not getting my messages? It's in a thread with the > title "Deputising for the rulekeepor". > > -- > Trigon > > On Oct 22, 2017 8:31 AM, "Alexis Hunt" <aler...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Huh? When? > > > On Sun, Oct 22, 2017, 10:26 Reuben Staley, <reuben.sta...@gmail.com> > wrote: > I don't think it's possible, as I have already deputized for rulekeepor. > > -- > Trigon > > On Oct 22, 2017 5:42 AM, "Publius Scribonius Scholasticus" > <p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com> wrote: > I pledge to deputize for the rulekeepor on October 19, 2017, if it is > still possible. > > > On 10/22/2017 12:14 AM, Alexis Hunt wrote: > > Huh, you're right, I could have sworn I saw them there... > > > > Rulekeepor is definitely out of date on SLRs; anyone could deputise > > for it with appropriate notice. They could also start an election, > > perhaps with a campaign pledge to reinstate CFJ annotations? > > > > On Sun, 22 Oct 2017 at 00:13 Madeline <j...@iinet.net.au > > <mailto:j...@iinet.net.au>> wrote: > > > > I mean... I had noticed :P and the ADoP office itself being in > > confusion > > is really troubling... > > > > > > On 2017-10-22 15:10, VJ Rada wrote: > > > The FLR hasn't had them in a long time: certainly not since I've > > been > > > a player. I think Gaelan took them out. > > > > > > JDGA: I'm ironically not sure what you can deputize for because I'm > > > late on my ADoP report (and am no longer ADoP) but I think it > > might be > > > just rulekeepor? o hasn't posted in about a week (I've kind of > > missed > > > him already haha) so it seems likely that he might miss this week's > > > report but it would take another week for you to deputize. > > Rulekeepor > > > I think you can next week but not this week (or next month because > > > Gaelan updated the FLR last month but forgot to file it as a > > report). > > > I think every other office is OK? > > > > > > And regarding the uploading: I certainly haven't uploaded my > > weeklies > > > to the website and nobody's really noticed. I think none of them are > > > really in date rip. Except, obviously, uploading the ruleset is > > > important. > > > > > > On Sun, Oct 22, 2017 at 3:05 PM, Alexis Hunt <aler...@gmail.com > > <mailto:aler...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > >> On Sat, 21 Oct 2017 at 23:54 VJ Rada <vijar...@gmail.com > > <mailto:vijar...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > >>> We really need to bring back rule annotations for important CFJs. > > >> > > >> The FLR has them, although I do not know if Gaelan has been > > keeping them up > > >> to date. > > >> > > >> https://faculty.washington.edu/kerim/nomic/cases/?2909 is the > > original > > >> precedent that I'm aware of (fun fact: "Wooble is a player" may > > be the > > >> single most common CFJ text of all time). > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
