Its text is a copy of an older 2466. You also left some of the revision numbers unfixed; I have fixed all the issues I've raised, along with some formatting issues in the YAML files themselves, in my local copy of AgoraNomic/ruleset which I'll push shortly.
On Mon, 23 Oct 2017 at 20:34 Publius Scribonius Scholasticus < [email protected]> wrote: > Please describe the issue, it looks identical to what appears in the > proposal to me. > > > On 10/23/2017 06:19 PM, Alexis Hunt wrote: > > A number of my previously issues, such as the text of rule 2309, > > remain unfixed. > > > > On Mon, 23 Oct 2017 at 16:46 Publius Scribonius Scholasticus > > <[email protected] > > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > > Yes, my main goal with this was to get an up to date ruleset > > published. > > If I were elected, I would rewrap the whole ruleset and improve the > > annotations. Additionally, I would reorganize the ruleset to be > > based on > > the subsystems, as opposed to the type of thing the rules is > > about. For > > example, I would replace Obligations with a specific thing for > > Contracts. > > > > > > On 10/23/2017 10:58 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Mon, 23 Oct 2017, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote: > > >> THE FULL LOGICAL RULESET > > > Comments: > > > > > > 1. A bunch of these still have wrapping problems. If it > > doesn't show > > > up in your client, the below-quoted shows how it shows up for me > > (that's > > > how it shows up for me even without quotes, and how it is in the > > mailman > > > archives). > > > > > > 2. I'm guessing you'll unpack the annotations to be more > > human-friendly? > > > > > > 3. For all candidates: the current logical ordering isn't the > > best, IMO. > > > I'd be interested if candidates have different ideas on logical > > ordering > > > (of course there is no perfect arrangement). > > > > > > > > >> > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >> > > >> Rule 1650/1 (Power=2) > > >> Silliness > > >> > > >> Each Nomic Week a Player is designated the Silly Person. > The > > >> Silly Person > > >> SHALL in that week, by announcement (1) designate another > > player, > > >> who has not > > >> been the Silly Person in the past two weeks, to be the > > next week's > > >> Silly > > >> Person; (2) submit a Silly Proposal. If there is ever no > > Silly > > >> Person or the > > >> Silly Person is not a player, then the next week's Silly > > Person is > > >> the first > > >> player that any player publicly designates to be the next > > week's > > >> Silly Person. > > >> > > >> A Silly Proposal is a Proposal whose sole contents are one > of > > >> the following: > > >> i) A limerick. > > >> ii) A rhymed poem no longer than fourteen lines. (No free > > >> verse!) > > >> iii) A joke of no more than a hundred words. > > >> iv) A truly hideous pun. > > >> > > >> The first Silly Proposal submitted by the week's Silly > > Person is > > >> an Official > > >> Proposal. > > > > > > >
