In fact, I'd be more inclined to say this *new* action (now being unambiguous intent to play) is in fact the Registration message.
On Wed, 25 Oct 2017, Kerim Aydin wrote: > How long after the fact are you comfortable with accepting evidence of > consent? (obviously this works for any future ratification). > > What if OscarMeyr came back and said - you know back in May and that > other CFJ - well actually I consent. > > On Wed, 25 Oct 2017, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote: > > > > However, this action should still be taken into account. > > > > On 10/25/2017 04:22 PM, VJ Rada wrote: > > > This doesn't affect the actual CFJ I called (because, as we all know, > > > CFJs are judged on the facts of their calling) but THIS might be the > > > player-like action we need to ratify ais523 in. > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 10:40 PM, Alex Smith <ais...@alumni.bham.ac.uk > > > <mailto:ais...@alumni.bham.ac.uk>> wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, 2017-10-25 at 02:14 -0400, Owen Jacobson wrote: > > > > Because this failed, I believe ais523’s attempt to buy a stamp also > > > > failed. > > > > > > > > The following chart shows the correct distribution of shinies, and I > > > > cause Agora to pay 1 sh. to each recipient listed below, in > > > order. In > > > > total, this will cause Agora to pay: > > > > > > > > * ProofTechnique: 8 sh. > > > > * ais523: 8 sh. > > > > * Gaelan: 4 sh. > > > > > > I buy a Stamp. > > > > > > I now have 8sh. minus whatever the stamp value is. > > > > > > -- > > > ais523 > >
