There is long-standing precedent that "CAN and SHALL within [time limit]"
does not limit the CAN; it only sets a deadline on the SHALL.

On Tue, 31 Oct 2017 at 22:11 VJ Rada <[email protected]> wrote:

> It's cool, Munn just needs to distribute my proposal and start the
> election again.
>
> The real problem would be, what happens if the ADoP didn't initiate in
> a timely way? It says that e CAN do so in a timely fashion which means
> e cannot outside of the 7 day period. And nor could anyone else.
>
> On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 1:06 PM, Aris Merchant
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > And I can't distribute them. And I can't remove them, because they're
> > pending. I knew this was a bad idea.
> >
> > -Aris
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 6:34 PM VJ Rada <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >> Sorry Munn, neither the initiation of the election nor the
> >> distribution of the proposal worked. Rules say the following "the ADoP
> >> CAN and SHALL, _in the same message_: 1) If the election is contested,
> >> initiate an Agoran decision to select the winner of the election (the
> >> poll). For this decision, the Vote Collector is the Assessor, the
> >> valid options are the candidates for that election (including those
> >> who become candidates after its initiation), and the voting method is
> >> instant runoff. 2) Distribute all pendingCampaign Proposals associated
> >> with the election.".
> >>
> >> Gotta be in the same message.
> >>
> >> On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 11:35 AM, ATMunn <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >> > Ah, thanks for letting me know.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On 10/31/2017 8:32 PM, VJ Rada wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> (by the way ATMunn, I am uncommitted).
> >> >>
> >> >> I vote for myself, and FOR my campaign proposal.
> >> >>
> >> >> On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 11:30 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
> >> >> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> >>>
> >> >>> I vote in favour.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> On 10/31/2017 08:29 PM, ATMunn wrote:
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> I was too lazy to check for very long, sorry.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> I hereby distribute the below campaign proposal, initiating the
> >> >>>> Agoran
> >> >>>> Decision of whether to adopt it. For this decision, the vote
> >> >>>> collector
> >> >>>> is the Assessor, the quorum is [quorum] and the valid options are
> FOR
> >> >>>> and AGAINST (PRESENT is always a valid vote, as are conditionals).
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>
> ///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
> >> >>>> Title: Referee Reform and Card Appealability
> >> >>>> Author: V.J. Rada
> >> >>>> Co-author(s):
> >> >>>> Adoption Index: 2
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> Change the power of rule 2451, Executive Orders, to 2.0. In this
> >> >>>> rule,
> >> >>>> replace the text "The reason for the card MAY be any grievance held
> >> >>>> by
> >> >>>> the Prime Minister" with "Notwithstanding rule 2426, the reason for
> >> >>>> the card MAY be any grievance held by the Prime Minister"
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> In rule 2426, replace the text
> >> >>>> "Cards CANNOT be issued except by players by announcement. Any
> >> >>>> attempt
> >> >>>> to issue a Card, or any intent for a dependent action to issue a
> >> >>>> Card,
> >> >>>> is INEFFECTIVE if it does not include the following information:
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> The type of Card being issued,
> >> >>>> The person to whom the Card is being issued (the bad sport), and
> >> >>>> The specific action, inaction of the bad sport giving rise to the
> >> >>>> Card
> >> >>>> (the reason)."
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> with the text
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> "Cards CANNOT be issued except by players by announcement. Any
> >> >>>> attempt
> >> >>>> to issue a Card is INEFFECTIVE if it does not include (1) the type
> of
> >> >>>> card being issued, (2) the name of the person being issued the card
> >> >>>> (the bad sport), and (3) the specific reason for the issuance of
> the
> >> >>>> card, or if it attempts to issue a person a card for an action or
> >> >>>> inaction which e (more likely than not) did not commit, or if it
> >> >>>> attempts to issue a card for an action or inaction which is not
> >> >>>> prohibited by law, or if it attempts to issue a type of card which
> is
> >> >>>> blatantly and obviously unsuited to the conduct which constitutes
> the
> >> >>>> reason for its issuance or to the person to which it is being
> issued,
> >> >>>> or if it is made more than 14 days after the conduct constituting
> the
> >> >>>> reason for the issuance of the card, or if it attempts to issue a
> >> >>>> card
> >> >>>> to a player who has already been issued a card for the conduct
> >> >>>> constituting the reason for the issuance of the card."
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> Also in rule 2426, remove the last paragraph.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> In rule 2479 "Official Justice", remove the last paragraph.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> Also in rule 2479, replace the text "The Referee CANNOT Point eir
> >> >>>> Finger or impose Summary Judgment more than five total times per
> >> >>>> week,
> >> >>>> or more than twice per week at or on the same person."
> >> >>>> with the text
> >> >>>> "The Referee CANNOT impose Summary Judgement more than three times
> a
> >> >>>> week".
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> Also in rule 2479, append, at the end of the first paragraph, the
> >> >>>> text
> >> >>>> "Summary Judgement is imposed on the Referee's own initiative, and
> >> >>>> not
> >> >>>> in response to any official proceeding".
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> In rule 2478, "Vigilante Justice", remove the last paragraph.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> Also in rule 2478, replace the text " - issuing a Card to the
> >> >>>> pointed-at person by announcement whose reason is rooted in the
> >> >>>> allegation; or"
> >> >>>> with the text
> >> >>>> " - Imposing the Cold Hand of Justice, issuing a Card to the
> >> >>>> pointed-at person by announcement whose reason is rooted in the
> >> >>>> allegation; or"
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> Also in rule 2478, add below the dot-points and above the paragraph
> >> >>>> beginning "The Referee is by default", add a new paragraph which
> >> >>>> reads
> >> >>>> "There is no limit on how many times a player may impose the Cold
> >> >>>> Hand
> >> >>>> of Justice per week".
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> Add a new rule at power 1 entitled "Referee Accountability" with
> the
> >> >>>> text "If the Referee attempts to issue three or more INEFFECTIVE
> >> >>>> cards
> >> >>>> in a week, any player CAN, with two support, issue a writ of
> >> >>>> Impartial
> >> >>>> Arbitration Restoration, immediately making the position of Referee
> >> >>>> vacant. When a writ of Impartial Arbitration Restoration is issued,
> >> >>>> the ADoP SHALL initiate an election for the Referee within a timely
> >> >>>> fashion"
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>
> ///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> I vote PRESENT (for now, I might change my vote later once I have
> >> >>>> time
> >> >>>> to actually think about what this is saying)
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> On 10/31/2017 4:09 PM, VJ Rada wrote:
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> ttttpf
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 7:08 AM, VJ Rada <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>
> https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg30296.html
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 7:07 AM, VJ Rada <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>> COE: There was absolutely a flippin' campaign proposal from me.
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 1:01 AM, ATMunn <[email protected]
> >
> >> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>> As per my duties as ADoP, I hereby initiate the Agoran Decision
> >> >>>>>>>> to
> >> >>>>>>>> select the winner of the Referee election.
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>> For this decision, the vote collector is the Assessor, the
> valid
> >> >>>>>>>> options are the candidates (PRESENT is always a valid vote, as
> >> >>>>>>>> are
> >> >>>>>>>> conditionals), and the voting method is instant runoff.
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>> Currently, the candidates are VJ Rada and o. As the election is
> >> >>>>>>>> contested, any player still may become a candidate until the
> poll
> >> >>>>>>>> ends.
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>> There were no campaign proposals.
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>> Also, I strongly encourage anyone voting on election-related
> >> >>>>>>>> things to
> >> >>>>>>>> post your votes in this thread from now on.
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>> Here are all of the current votes (attn: PSS)
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>
> ///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>> Rulekeepor
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>> o: {PSS, Alexis, Trigon}
> >> >>>>>>>> ATMunn: {Alexis, PSS}
> >> >>>>>>>> Alexis: Conditional ({Alexis, Trigon} if Alexis publishes a FLR
> >> >>>>>>>> draft
> >> >>>>>>>>           to a forum before the end of the voting period;
> >> >>>>>>>> {Trigon,
> >> >>>>>>>> Alexis}
> >> >>>>>>>>           otherwise.)
> >> >>>>>>>> VJ Rada: {Trigon}
> >> >>>>>>>> PSS: {PSS, Alexis}
> >> >>>>>>>> Aris: {Trigon, Alexis}
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>
> ///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>> Agronomist
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>> ATMunn: {o}
> >> >>>>>>>> VJ Rada: PRESENT
> >> >>>>>>>> PSS: PRESENT
> >> >>>>>>>> Alexis: {o, VJ Rada}
> >> >>>>>>>> o: {o, VJ Rada}
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>
> ///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>> Proposals 7954-7956
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>          |7954|7955|7956
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>
> -------+----+----+----+------------------------------------------------
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>> ATMunn |F   |A   |F   |
> >> >>>>>>>> VJ Rada|F   |A   |F   |
> >> >>>>>>>> PSS    |F   |A   |F   |
> >> >>>>>>>> Alexis |F   |F   |F   |
> >> >>>>>>>> o      |F   |A   |F   |
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>
> -------+----+----+----+------------------------------------------------
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>
> ///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>> --
> >> >>>>>>>   From V.J. Rada
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> --
> >> >>>>>>   From V.J. Rada
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>> --
> >> >>> ----
> >> >>> Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> From V.J. Rada
>
>
>
> --
> From V.J. Rada
>

Reply via email to