Pretty sure I retracted that version of Community Chest Repeal and replaced it with a version that amended the two rules in sequential order.
On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 6:24 PM, Aris Merchant < [email protected]> wrote: > I have trouble believing that this is it, but these are all the > proposals I could find. > > -Aris > --- > I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran > Decision of whether to adopt it, and removing it from the proposal > pool. For this decision, the vote collector is the Assessor, the > quorum is 6.0 and the valid options are FOR and AGAINST (PRESENT is > also a valid vote, as are valid conditional votes). > > ID Author(s) AI Title Pender Pend > fee > ------------------------------------------------------------ > --------------- > 7957* G. 1.0 Random Irony G. OP [1] > 7958* G. 2.0 Succession Planning G. OP [1] > 7959* Telnaior 3.0 Deregistration Fix Telnaior 1 AP > 7960* V.J. Rada 2.0 Community Chest Repeal V.J. Rada 2 sh. > 7961* G. 1.0 Fear less G. 1 AP > > > The proposal pool currently contains the following proposals: > > ID Author(s) AI Title > ------------------------------------------------------------ > --------------- > pp1 Alexis 1.7 A Most Ingenious Paradox > > Legend: <ID>* : Proposal is pending. > > [1] Official Proposal, inherently pending > > > A proposal may be pended for 1 AP, or for 1/20th the Floating Value > in shines (see the Treasuror's report). > > The full text of the aforementioned proposals is included below. > > ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// > ID: 7957 > Title: Random Irony > Adoption index: 1.0 > Author: G. > Co-authors: > OFFICIAL PROPOSAL > > > Repeal Rule 2505 (Random Choices). > > ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// > ID: 7958 > Title: Succession Planning > Adoption index: 2.0 > Author: G. > Co-authors: > OFFICIAL PROPOSAL > > > Amend Rule 1006 (Offices) by replacing: > > The holder of an elected office CAN resign it by announcement, causing > it to become vacant. > > with: > > The holder of an elected office CAN resign it by announcement, causing > it to become vacant. The non-interim holder of an elected office CAN, > With 3 Support, resign the office while appointing another player to > become the holder of the office, provided that other player is one of > the Supporters. > > ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// > ID: 7959 > Title: Deregistration Fix > Adoption index: 3.0 > Author: Telnaior > Co-authors: > > > Amend Rule 869 ("How to Join and Leave Agora", power 3) as follows: > Modify the string "If a player has not sent a message to a public forum > in the > last month, then any player CAN deregister em without objection." > to > "If a player has not sent a message to a public forum in the last month, > then any player CAN deregister em with 3 Agoran Consent." > > ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// > ID: 7960 > Title: Community Chest Repeal > Adoption index: 2.0 > Author: V.J. Rada > Co-authors: > > > Repeal rule 2508, "Community Chest" > Amend rules 2510 "Such is Karma" and 2511 "Karmic Balance" by > replacing any instances of the phrases "the Community Chest" and "The > Community Chest" with the word "Agora". > > ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// > ID: 7961 > Title: Fear less > Adoption index: 1.0 > Author: G. > Co-authors: > > > Repeal Rule 2309 (The Propose-O-Matic). > > [It's a bit of a fun thing when the game is slow, but otherwise just > adds some noise, and plenty of us are looking at the past for things > to re-enact without it]. > > ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// > ID: pp1 > Title: A Most Ingenious Paradox > Adoption index: 1.7 > Author: Alexis > Co-authors: > > > Text in square brackets is not a part of this proposal and has no > effect. > > Enact a new power-1 rule entitled "Win by Paradox": > > If a CFJ has been assigned a judgment of PARADOXICAL continuously > for at least 7 days, and e has not done so already in respect of > that CFJ, then that case's initiator CAN, by announcement, win the > game. > > A player who wins in this fashion SHOULD submit a proposal to > prevent the paradox from arising again. > > Amend rule 591 by replacing: > > The valid judgements for an inquiry case are as follows, based on > the truth or falsity of the statement at the time the inquiry case > was initiated (if its truth value changed at that time, then its > initial truth value is used): > > with: > > The valid judgements for an inquiry case are as follows, based on > the facts and legal situation at the time the inquiry case was > initiated, not taking into account any events since that time: > > [This is to prevent changing facts not related to truth or falsity, e.g. > availability of information, from affecting outcomes.] > > and by replacing: > > * DISMISS, appropriate if the statement is malformed, undecidable, > if insufficient information exists to make a judgement with > reasonable effort, or the statement is otherwise not able to be > answered with another valid judgement. > > with: > > * DISMISS, appropriate if the statement is malformed, undecidable, > if insufficient information exists to make a judgement with > reasonable effort, or the statement is otherwise not able to be > answered with another valid judgement. DISMISS is not > appropriate if PARADOXICAL is appropriate. > > and by appending to the end: > > * PARADOXICAL, appropriate if the statement is logically > undecidable as a result of a paradox or or other irresovable > logical situation. PARADOXICAL is not appropriate if IRRELEVANT > is appropriate, nor is it appropriate if the undecidability > arises from the case itself. > > [The reference to IRRELEVANT is to prevent multiple wins from the same > paradox.] > > ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// > -- >From V.J. Rada
