FWIW, the sd based on the most recent report was 2.38.
I don't mind the idea myself, but I'm always a bit leery of calculations that require knowing the whole set to figure out an individual's status. Though happy to try it now since gamma/samurai don't have other game effects. On Mon, 6 Nov 2017, Reuben Staley wrote: > Then how about three standard deviations? You have to be a REAL outlier to get > above that threshold. > > On 11/6/2017 5:23 PM, VJ Rada wrote: > > The point is there's always an Honourless Worm and whatever its counterpart > > is, but you have to be _really bad_ to be a gamma or _really good_ to be a > > samurai. This misses the point. > > > > On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 11:21 AM, Reuben Staley <[email protected] > > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > > This makes it so that there will always be Samurai and Gammas. > > > > ---- > > > > Replace the first item of the unordered list in 2510 with "Any > > player with a karma greater than or equal to one standard deviation > > of the set of all karma scores is a Samurai." > > > > Replace the second item of the unordered list in 2510 with "Any > > player with a karma less than or equal to one negative standard > > deviation of the set of all karma scores is a Gamma." > > > > -- Trigon
