> On Nov 9, 2017, at 9:39 AM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: > > > > Well, I did about the same as Herald when I re-posted the victory election > thing. Traditionally, the proof of a scammer's good intent is an actual > proposal to fix the problem. I think an apology is appropriate, where the > apology included a fix. I'm not sure if the fix is stopping all these dumb > micropayments, versus just among sure to help get that auction proposal > out as soon as humanly possible.
I can work with that. The Auctions v4 draft I just submitted has an auction-specific fix for micropayments. I do think we need to tighten up what it means to pay, and to spend, Shinies. How’s this for a sketch: * Where the rules define an amount of an asset to be paid to a recipient, any attempt to pay an amount other than the full amount due is INEFFECTIVE. * To spend an amount of a currency is to transfer that amount to Agora. -o
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
