On Mon, 13 Nov 2017, Alexis Hunt wrote: > > - On various occasions, rulekeepors combined multiple changes made by a > > single proposal into one change in the history. Rule 1681 is clear that > > each Rule Change must be recorded separately. While I would like to correct > > all this data, doing it for all cases where a proposal amended a rule > > multiple times is infeasible. That said, on a number of occasions, the > > history indicated that a single proposal changed a rule's power and amended > > it, or retitled it and amended it.
This rung a bell - there's a series of linked CFJs I ended up judging, all of CFJs 1638-1645, that exhaustively covered things like within a Proposal, two separate phrases: "Amend Rule N by X. Amend Rule N by Y." are two rule changes, while "Amend Rule N by X and by Y" is one rule change. Probably far more detail then we can ever reconstruct...
