On Nov 19, 2017, at 3:01 PM, Kerim Aydin <[email protected]> wrote:
>> AP-CFJ: "If a proposal specifies an amendment to a rule consisting of >> multiple parts, one of which is a title change, then the entire amendment >> fails." > > This is CFJ 3599. > > >> Shiny-CFJ: "If a proposal specifies to "amend" a rule by changing its >> title (and no other change), it succeeds in retitling the rule." > > This is CFJ 3600. > > >> shiny-CFJ: "Proposal 7924 succeeded in amending Rule 1023". > > This is CFJ 3601. > > I assign all three of the above CFJs to o. (sorry, o!) Not at all. I’m looking forward to this one: this is the kind of gritty mechanical CFJ (series, but they’re effectively a single giant CFJ) that I enjoy. -o
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
