> On Nov 21, 2017, at 3:54 AM, VJ Rada <[email protected]> wrote: > > The judgement's statement that the shiny is mine is dicta: absolutely > no relevance to the case's statement. Call another CFJ.
I’m content to let support determine whether there’s any followup. This is well into angels on pins territory: I don’t think Agorans will _actually_ retroactively un-do actions after any significant delay, and we have multiple safety mechanisms to sort that out if and when it arises.
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
