Oh fair fair point actually, yeah. The question then becomes: did you break that rule.
Yeah, retract that CFJ. On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 12:57 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus <p.scribonius.scholasti...@googlemail.com> wrote: > I can through the "The following officers CAN by announcement award Favours > in the listed Parties" at the beginning of the rule. > ---- > Publius Scribonius Scholasticus > p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com > > > >> On Nov 21, 2017, at 8:48 PM, VJ Rada <vijar...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> I note two things. >> >> 1: It's a perverse incentive to award Justice Favours to those who >> point fingers at themselves >> 2: There's an immediacy requirement for legislation favours but not >> participation favours. Why? Who knows! >> >> I actually don't believe either of these favours worked. They both use >> SHALLS, which imply CANS by announcement. However, legislation favours >> say "SHALL immediately after" which implies "CAN by announcement >> immediately after". And participation favours are misspelled, so I >> believe they are unawardable at this time. >> >> I issue PSS a green card for failing to distribute legislation >> favours. I issue em a Justice favour for pointing the finger. > -- >From V.J. Rada
