>But this wouldn't work in the same way that the Registrar need not track >contract-defined switches. The reason the Registrar need not track such switches is that switches are defined as within the rules. Duties can be imposed by non-rule things.
On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 12:31 PM, VJ Rada <vijar...@gmail.com> wrote: >>If you were also, Treasuror, with distributions, you could be even more >>efficient > Yes, yeah, I already pointed out that o could get infinite favours this way > > On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 12:30 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus > <p.scribonius.scholasti...@googlemail.com> wrote: >> If you were also, Treasuror, with distributions, you could be even more >> efficient. But this wouldn't work in the same way that the Registrar need >> not track contract-defined switches. >> ---- >> Publius Scribonius Scholasticus >> p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com >> >> >> >>> On Nov 22, 2017, at 8:28 PM, VJ Rada <vijar...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> My promise to Cuddlebeam was much less strict than I remember, so I'm >>> just going to solicit opinions on whether or not this would work. In >>> fact, I pledge not to do any of the actions taken in this message. >>> >>> Basically you'd have to make a contract that said "you have to write a >>> report on how many stars there are in the solar system every 5 seconds >>> for the next 10 minutes". Reward claiming is not for duty-fulfilling >>> OFFICIAL reports, but just for duty-fulfilling reports. Neither duty >>> nor report is defined, so duty is just any obligation and report is >>> some document giving information. Claim a reward of 5 shinies every 5 >>> seconds, pay that back to agora in economic favours, repeat ad >>> nauseum. >>> >>> -- >>> From V.J. Rada >> > > > > -- > From V.J. Rada -- >From V.J. Rada
