>(also barring the person who already wrote the judgement is kind of a jerk move)
Yes but you see I actually like being able to take actions for an entire month unbarred by incorrect textual interpretation. I think that my right to do that should supplant the ettiquete of cfj calling! On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 1:56 PM, Telnaior <[email protected]> wrote: > We've just been talking about how non-players need to be able to call CFJs > so they can dispute eir own deregistration. That suggests the > deregistration still takes hold, at least initially. > In this instance the Door has already been Slammed, so I think a better > idea for now might be to do this: > > I spend an Action Point (2 -> 1) to call a CFJ with the text "VJ Rada > successfully called the quoted CFJ". > > Slamming the Door has no such protection, and we do already have an > "informal opinion" that states it could have worked. I don't think it could > have gone through. > (also barring the person who already wrote the judgement is kind of a jerk > move) > > > > On 2017-11-28 13:49, VJ Rada wrote: > >> I use AP to call a CFJ with the statement: The Door cannot be Slammed on >> V.J. Rada. >> >> I bar ATMunn. >> >> -- >From V.J. Rada
