I favor this CFJ. -Aris
On Sun, Feb 11, 2018 at 6:00 PM, ATMunn <iamingodsa...@gmail.com> wrote: > I do not consent to abiding by any rule stating that I cannot register as a > player. > > I register as a player. > > I free-CFJ on the following statement: "ATMunn is a player." > > Arguments: > > Rule 869 states that "An Unregistered person CAN (unless explicitly > forbidden or prevented by the rules) register by publishing a message that > indicates reasonably clearly and reasonably unambiguously that e intends to > become a player at that time. A player CAN deregister (cease being a player) > by announcement. If e does so, e CANNOT register or be registered for 30 > days." > > This reasonably implies that if a player deregisters, e is not allowed to > register again for 30 days. > > The problem arises when you look at the very next paragraph: "A person, by > registering, agrees to abide by the Rules. The Rules CANNOT otherwise bind a > person to abide by any agreement without that person's willful consent." > > Before I sent this message, I was not a player. Therefore, the rules CANNOT > bind me to abide by them. This means that I do not have to abide by the rule > stating that I cannot register. > > There is also the statement in a later paragraph stating a similar thing: > "The Rules CANNOT compel non-players to act without their express or > reasonably implied consent." > > I clearly did not give consent to the rules compelling me to not be able to > register, so they CANNOT compel me to do so by the above rule. > > So, I call for a verdict of TRUE. Feel free to argue away.
