Recently, there was a proto submitted based on the PAoaM system where you have to destroy a number of the assets to achieving a win. That's technically buying a win in the loosest way possible since all the assets are defined as currencies.
On Feb 13, 2018 14:12, "Alex Smith" <ais...@alumni.bham.ac.uk> wrote: On Tue, 2018-02-13 at 12:04 -0800, Kerim Aydin wrote: > In some ways a win is worth far more (bragging value and permanent > record) and > in some ways less (if I bribed each person a number of shinies to > vote for me > to win in a proposal, I bet "buying" a win would be - oh I dunno in > the 50-shiny > neighborhood or so at a guess). People ought to buy wins more often. Have we had an outright purchased win since proposal 5884? (Even that turned into a mess of scams and counterscams with respect to interpretation of the conditional vote rules. The win only went through because a significant proportion of bribe requests were sufficiently ambiguous that they ended up counting as PRESENT rather than AGAINST.) -- ais523