Sigh. We really need to do something to make the distribution of assets fair again. I mean, we can't take everything away, because there's no rule violation involved, but we could at least even it out a bit. The asset distribution is so unfair at the moment that I'm worried about the long term impact. Opinions?
-Aris On Sun, Mar 4, 2018 at 5:55 PM Kenyon Prater <kprater3...@gmail.com> wrote: > > If the mine at (-1, -1) is nonempty, then I do the following: > > Destroy 1 apple to move from (0, 0) to (-1, 0) > Destroy 1 apple to move to (-1, -1) > Take all the contents of the mine at (-1,-1) > Destroy 1 apple to move to (0, -1) > Destroy 1 apple to move to (1, -1) > Take all the contents of the farm at (1, -1) > Destroy two apples to move to (1, 0) > Destroy one apple to move to (1, 1) > Take all the contents of the mine at (1, 1) > Destroy one apple to move to (0, 1) > Destroy one apple to move to (-1, 1) > Take all the contents of the orchard at (-1, 1)