Whoa. You sure like hyperbole.

~Corona‚Äč

On 19:46, Mar 8, 2018, at 19:46, Cuddle Beam <cuddleb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>You're missing me claiming that I'm horribly stupid for missing
>precisely
>that a few messages after that lol.
>
>On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 6:40 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu>
>wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, 8 Mar 2018, Cuddle Beam wrote:
>> > "In a conflict between clauses of the same Rule, if exactly one
>claims
>> > precedence over the other, then it takes precedence; otherwise, the
>> > later clause takes precedence."
>>
>> Um, in R2549, the "later" clause for the purposes of R2240 is the
>CANNOT,
>> right?  So wouldn't the CANNOT take precedence - what am I missing?
>>
>>
>>
>>

Reply via email to