Whoa. You sure like hyperbole. ~Corona
On 19:46, Mar 8, 2018, at 19:46, Cuddle Beam <cuddleb...@gmail.com> wrote: >You're missing me claiming that I'm horribly stupid for missing >precisely >that a few messages after that lol. > >On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 6:40 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> >wrote: > >> >> >> On Thu, 8 Mar 2018, Cuddle Beam wrote: >> > "In a conflict between clauses of the same Rule, if exactly one >claims >> > precedence over the other, then it takes precedence; otherwise, the >> > later clause takes precedence." >> >> Um, in R2549, the "later" clause for the purposes of R2240 is the >CANNOT, >> right? So wouldn't the CANNOT take precedence - what am I missing? >> >> >> >>
