>I deputize for the Registrar

You'll have to do this again.

On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 9:55 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote:
>
>
> GUESS WHAT:  It's worse than that.  There *is* no Referee's weekly report!
> There's no place I can find that puts together "referee" and "Report".
>
> While the rules say the Referee is the "recordkeepor" for pledges,
> it doesn't say that it's part of a Report.  R2143 says that if something is
> "part of a report" without saying each one, it's part of the weekly report.
> The same is true for Blots (R2555).  No report defined.
>
> I don't think there's anything in the rules that says that merely saying
> "recordkeepor" means "part of report"?  In fact, the only thing "recordkeepor"
> does that I can find is make that quantity restricted as per R2125, I can't
> find any requirement to publish the record - the requirement comes from
> explicitly saying something is part of a report.  Of course this is a bug,
> it *should* be part of a report, but for the technicality of the recent
> deputization success this is important.  Is this clear enough or is it
> CFJ-worthy do you think?
>
>
> SO TO CONVERGE THE GAMESTATE IF THE OFFICE IS VACANT:
>
> I deputize for the Registrar conclude the investigation into Aris's recent
> finger-pointing as follows:
>
> The facts are correct.  Cold Hand of Justice Imposed:
>
> 2 Blots is the base penalty.  I think a first offense of a missed report
> should start with the lowest penalty (lowest common infraction as a
> baseline).  So I levy a fine of 1 blot on VJ Rada.
>
> This is forgivable, so does not take away salary for this month (no words
> specified for the apology).
>
> I'm not sure for future if the 2nd or 3rd missed report (14 or 21 days
> of "no work") would be the threshold for unforgivable for the purposes of
> losing a month's salary.
>
> On Tue, 10 Apr 2018, Aris Merchant wrote:
>> I point my finger at V.J. Rada for failing to publish the Notary's weekly
>> report. In general I agreee with G.'s two week rule, but in this case the
>> person responsible failed to publish the report after being elected to the
>> office.
>>
>> -Aris
>
>
> On Wed, 11 Apr 2018, Ned Strange wrote:
>> Alert: As this report does not contain pledges, it is no report at
>> all. You are no referee but a mere IMPOSTOR
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 4:04 AM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > I deputize for the Referee to publish the following weekly report:
>> >
>> >                  ------------------------
>> >                   Referee's Weekly Report
>> >                  ------------------------
>> >
>> >    No one has any Blots.  No instances of blots currently exist.
>> >
>> >                  -----end of report------
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Sun, 8 Apr 2018, Cuddle Beam wrote:
>> >
>> >> I resign Referee. Gnomic is starting to get inertia with its initial
>> >> culture and history and I'd like to help it out (it's also why I've been
>> >> away lately, sorry).
>> >>
>> >> On Sat, Apr 7, 2018 at 9:47 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> 
>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > As I mentioned several days ago, I plan in future to point fingers at
>> >> > officers who miss two successive weekly reports. Just to set a good
>> >> > standard going forward! (Others may still enforce a tougher standard
>> >> > if they wish, of course).
>> >> >
>> >> > When this week ends in ~28 hours, officers who would be blotted would
>> >> > be Corona (Herald's weekly) and CuddleBeam (Referee's weekly).
>> >> >
>> >> > (If I missed a report my apologies, I'll double-check before blotting).
>> >> >
>> >> > -G.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> From V.J. Rada
>>
>
>



-- 
>From V.J. Rada

Reply via email to