I couldn't myself write such a proposal, being without assets.

On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 11:31 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote:
>
>
> I think e should get it all back.  It was harmless.
>
> If there isn't enough consensus for a w/o objection modification,
> maybe a proposal (power 2.1 does it right?).
>
> I object to Aris's intent.
>
> On Thu, 12 Apr 2018, Corona wrote:
>> What about amending it in such a way that everyone gets a coin and VJ Rada
>> gets the rest back? I wouldn't object to that.
>>
>>
>> On Thursday, April 12, 2018, Aris Merchant <
>> thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Sigh. I tend to agree with you, actually. All of your assets is a bit much.
>> > That might be hard to recover from. However, it isn't terribly equitable
>> > for you to get off free after attempting a scam, even one that we've sort
>> > of encouraged with the Boo Lien system. Also, giving all of your assets to
>> > one contract is always a horrible idea. I'm curious what other think. Maybe
>> > you should get 1/2 or 3/4 or something of them back? Whatever it is, we'd
>> > need to come up with something that no one would object to, considering
>> > that the contract can only be amended without objection (also always a bad
>> > idea not to provide a way to amend a contract).
>> >
>> > -Aris
>> >
>> > On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 12:09 AM Ned Strange <edwardostra...@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > > I really do think that me losing all of my assets over this is
>> > inequitable.
>> > >
>> > > On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 3:16 PM, Ned Strange <edwardostra...@gmail.com>
>> > > wrote:
>> > > > That is, I object for myself and PSS to Aris's intent
>> > > >
>> > > > On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 2:04 PM, Ned Strange <edwardostra...@gmail.com
>> > >
>> > > wrote:
>> > > >> I object both for myself and PSS.
>> > > >>
>> > > >> On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 1:37 PM, Aris Merchant
>> > > >> <thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > >>> Well, I object. There is no reason we should allow you to reclaim
>> > your
>> > > >>> assets from a badly designed scam contract. I intend, with 2 Agoran
>> > > >>> consent, to destroy the contract "Hi".
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>> -Aris
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>> On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 7:13 PM Ned Strange <
>> > edwardostra...@gmail.com>
>> > > >>> wrote:
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>>> I object and intend to amend "Hi!" without objection to have the new
>> > > >>>> text "VJ Rada can transfer all assets in this contract to emself by
>> > > >>>> announcement".
>> > > >>>>
>> > > >>>> On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 12:12 PM, Ned Strange <
>> > > edwardostra...@gmail.com>
>> > > >>>> wrote:
>> > > >>>> > I intend to amend the contract called "Hi", without objection. The
>> > > new
>> > > >>>> > text of that contract would state "VJ Rada can remove all assets
>> > > from
>> > > >>>> > this contract by announcement".
>> > > >>>> >
>> > > >>>> > --
>> > > >>>> > From V.J. Rada
>> > > >>>>
>> > > >>>>
>> > > >>>>
>> > > >>>> --
>> > > >>>> From V.J. Rada
>> > > >>>>
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >> --
>> > > >> From V.J. Rada
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > --
>> > > > From V.J. Rada
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > > From V.J. Rada
>> > >
>> >
>>
>
>



-- 
>From V.J. Rada

Reply via email to